· Regulatory Updates  · 22 min read

Analysis of Trump's Day One Executive Orders

Analysis of President Trump's first 47 Presidential Actions, including their impact on technology policy, AI regulation, and organizational considerations.
tl;dr

President Trump issued 47 Presidential Actions on his first day in office, including 26 Executive Orders, 5 Presidential Proclamations, 12 Presidential Memoranda, and 4 other Actions. Key impacts on technology include the rescission of EO 14110 on AI safety, establishment of DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), and a 75-day pause on TikTok shutdown. The Actions span multiple categories with government operations/personnel and immigration/border security being the most active areas.

Following yesterday’s inauguration, President Trump followed through on his prior statements that he would quickly be issuing numerous Executive Orders. He authorized 47 Presidential Actions last night alone - I’ve run statistics on the Actions and provided summaries below. Unsurprisingly, much of the impact of these actions is to undo Executive Orders issued by former President Biden. Not many of these directly relate to my own professional interests (i.e., emerging technology), but there were a few notable cases, as I’ll discuss below. If you’re interested in a summary of each Action, you can find that at the end of this post.

Breaking it Down

Of the 47 Actions, 26 were Executive Orders, 5 were Presidential Proclamations, 12 were Presidential Memoranda, and 4 were some other type of Presidential Action. Here it is in pretty chart form.

Pie Chart of Presidential Actions on January 20, 2025
Presidential Actions by Type on January 20, 2025

Ok…but what’s the difference between an EO, a proclamation, a memorandum, and whatever “other” is? There is no clear legal definition, but the following is a guide to how each is generally characterized:

  • Executive Orders: these generally carry the force of law (if the President has actual authority to make such an order) and are required to be published in the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations. They often direct Government agencies and officials to undertake certain actions.

  • Presidential proclamations: in the current environment, these are more ceremonial and generally don’t carry the force of law, unless the Constitution or federal statute give the President authority. These actions generally concern the activity of private individuals.

  • Presidential memoranda: These have no legal weight; they are not required to cite any legal authority, do not have to be printed in the Federal Register, and do not require a Budgetary Impact Statement from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

The “other” category in my breakdown consisted entirely of announcements of acting cabinet and sub-cabinet positions, and appointments of cabinet and cabinet-level officials. Now let’s break the Actions down by category. The categories that I’ve selected are:

  • Economy/Business/Trade: Actions relating to economic policy, trade agreements, regulation of businesses, and related financial matters.

  • Immigration/Border Security: Actions focused on immigration laws, border control, refugee policies, and related enforcement.

  • Government Operations/Personnel: Actions related to the internal workings of the government, personnel changes, administrative procedures, and restructuring.

  • Environment/Energy: Actions concerning environmental regulations, energy policy, natural resources, and related issues.

  • National Security/Foreign Policy: Actions concerning national defense, international relations, treaties, foreign aid, and responses to threats.

  • Social Issues: Actions related to cultural, ethical, and societal matters, including civil rights, gender issues, and historical recognition.

  • Symbolic/Commemorative: Actions related to national symbols, holidays, and recognitions.

  • Legal/Justice System: Actions related to law enforcement, legal changes, court system actions, and criminal justice.

It’s difficult (and not particularly helpful) to try to limit each Action’s scope to a single category, so I’ve allowed for multiple categories for the Actions. The most active categories in Trump’s first day were “government operations/personnel” and “immigration/border security”, with 16 Actions falling into each category. This aligns with what we’ve heard from Trump before he took office - he has repeatedly stated that the federal government is inefficient and that America needs to reassess immigration policy.

Bar Chart of Presidential Actions on January 20, 2025 by Category
Presidential Actions by Category on January 20, 2025

Hitting the Undo Button

Trump’s Executive Order “Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions” acts as a bulk rescission of Biden’s EOs: Trump rescinds 67 Executive Orders and 11 Presidential Memoranda.

In addition, Trump explicitly revoked more than 20 prior Executive Orders, reversed the naming of Mount Denali (back to Mount McKinley), and rescinded certain regulations and policies.

In total, 7 of the 47 Presidential Actions taken yesterday (approximately 15%) focus on undoing prior policies, rather than taking new actions.

Technology Impact

Rescission of Executive Order 14110

The most direct and notable impact on technology that came out of yesterday’s Actions was the rescission Executive Order 14110 of October 30, 2023 (Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence). This Executive Order had outlined requirements for the safe and responsible development of AI. It explicitly established the US AI Safety Institute (US AISI) and directed the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to establish guidelines, benchmarks, and other resources related to the security, safety, and trustworthiness AI systems, particularly dual-use foundation models and generative AI. So what does the rescission mean for the US with respect to AI regulation?

Previously, all of the big players in AI development had joined the US AI Safety Institute, with OpenAI and Anthropic signing agreements with the Institute relating to model testing and evaluation. Will we see the US AI Safety Institute dismantled? What impact would this have on model availability and safety? It’s unlikely that Trump’s administration will be silent on this matter, but rather that they want to establish new focus and policies that support that. Based on Trump’s previous actions and comments on the matter, it’s likely that he will focus on policies that encourage America’s AI power, though it remains to be seen exactly how this will play out.

Establishment of DOGE

The Executive Order “Establishing and Implementing the President’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)” renames the prior US Digital Service to DOGE Service and establishes a temporary organization to facilitate the transition to this new department. Trump focuses on governmental efficiency through the use of modernized technology and improved data integrity. The Order directs every US agency to establish a DOGE team (which includes an HR specialist, an attorney, an engineer, and a DOGE Team Lead) within the next 30 days, making it clear that Trump is moving quickly on his goal to assess governmental agency efficiency. It will be interesting to see whether this plays out as purely technological modernization (unlikely), or if we will see more significant agency shakeups as the DOGE teams begin their work (the more likely outcome, in my opinion).

Pause on TikTok Shutdown

In the “Application of Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act to TikTok” Executive Order, Trump orders the Attorney General and Department of Justice to refrain for 75 days from taking any action to enforce the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (the “Act”) (Pub. L. 118-50, div. H), which had become effective the day before Trump took office. Given that Trump had previously discussed banning TikTok during his prior presidency, his statement that he wants to find a resolution that “protects national security while saving a platform used by 170 million Americans” is an interesting turn of perspective. We will likely hear more during this 75-day pause, not only with respect to TikTok specifically, but also with respect to intelligence, national security, and technology and China.

C-Suite and Board-Level Considerations

With a regime shift at the federal level, organizations must be prepared for the ensuing regulatory uncertainty; even where there is certainty, it can be challenging for organizations to quickly adapt to new requirements. The changing political landscape crosses multiple categories that impact businesses: from environmental regulations to trade policies, from potential supply change disruptions to DEI mandates. Awareness of these shifting political requirements and the ensuing global impact is essential to making good strategic and operational decisions.

Trump has been vocal about changes that he wants to make while in office: this makes it easier for boards and executives to spot areas that are ripe for change. While we may not yet know the specifics of how these will play out, organizations should be ready to adapt their governance and operations to adjust for changes.

Board Considerations

  • “America First” trade policies: what impact will tariffs, supply chain disruptions, and trade restrictions have on us? Can we proactively address these vulnerabilities?

  • ESG requirements: how do we want to approach ESG responsibilities if they are not federally-mandated? What impact will changes have on our ability to access capital? Will investor sentiment about ESG change?

  • Policy oversight: does our board sufficiently engage in policy review to ensure that we understand the impact changing policies would have on our operations and risk management strategies?

Full Summary

If you’re interested in a summary of all of the Presidential Actions from January 20, 2025, I’ve included them here. These summaries are AI-generated, with an “ELI5” (Explain it to me like I’m 5) focus; these come from the ALEA Institute (The Institute for the Advancement of Legal and Ethical AI), where I am the Head of Governance. We have an open source project (usregs.ai) designed to make federal regulations easier to understand for the general public. We use artificial intelligence to provide clear explanations and highlight key points from US Federal Register regulations, and we’ve used the same process to summarize Trump’s Presidential Actions. Importantly, this means that the summary could be incorrect and should not be relied upon for legal purposes.

Related Posts

View All Posts »